The TRT keeps recruitment activity, communications, documents, and follow-up connected in one guided workflow. In our retrospective audit, TRT-supported workflows produced 96% fewer recorded errors per recruitment session, including protocol, documentation, disposition, scheduling, callback, handoff, and communication errors.4
Recruitment staff rated satisfaction with the TRT-supported process 9.2/10, compared with 4.2/10 without the TRT. The TRT gives CRCs a simpler, more organized way to manage candidate recruitment.5
See how the TRT can help your team move from study startup to candidate enrollment faster, with less manual work and fewer errors.
1 Internal comparison of 17 non-TRT and 19 beta-TRT Phase 3 trial datasets for the same indication; p < 0.0001.
2 Approximately 1,100 sessions per workflow across 19 non-TRT and 23 beta-TRT trial datasets. The measured 39% comparison had p < 0.0001; the more-than-99% comparison was modeled using observed workflow times and industry averages.
3 Scheduling rates were 2.7% with beta TRT versus 1.9% without TRT across all candidate approaches; p < 0.0001.
4 Errors per recruitment session across 19 non-TRT and 23 beta-TRT trial datasets; p < 0.0001.
5 Retrospective survey of 11 recruiters, each with at least 100 sessions under both workflows; satisfaction difference p < 0.0001.
All reported outcomes involved a beta version of TRT that did not include all current tools. Results may vary. Summary data are available upon request.